IN RE NAPSTER, INC. COPYRIGHT LITIGATION

Nos. C MDL-00-1369-MHP, C 04-1166-MHP.

354 F.Supp.2d 1113 (2005)

In re NAPSTER, INC. COPYRIGHT LITIGATION UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs, v. Hummer Winblad Venture Partners, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 3, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn D. Pomerantz, Kelly M. Klaus, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Stephen D. Alexander, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Richard Stephen Busch, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Peter L. Simmons, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Theodore Kevin Cheng, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York City, Paul Hamilton Duvall, King & Ballow, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Ragesh K. Tangri, John Watkins Keker, Ravind Singh Grewal, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.

Michael H. Page, Keker & Van Nest, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants and Claimants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Re: Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims

PATEL, District Judge.

This action arises from the litigation related to the alleged copyright infringement by Napster, Inc. On April 21, 2003, plaintiffs UMG Recordings, Inc. and twelve other record labels (collectively "plaintiffs") filed this action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that defendants Hummer Winblad Venture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases