WONG v. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

No. 01-17432.

410 F.3d 1052 (2005)

Andrew H.K. WONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 17, 2003.

Filed August 18, 2004.

Amended June 7, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Siegel (argued), Hunter Pyle, Siegle & Yee, Oakland, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Michael T. Lucey, Michael D. Bruno, Joel K. Liberson (argued), Gordon & Rees LLP, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellee.

Before BEEZER, THOMAS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The majority opinion filed on August 18, 2004, is amended as follows:

At 379 F.3d at 1108, replace the first sentence of the paragraph which begins "Regarding the activity of learning ...," with the following:

Regarding the activity of learning, Wong's claim to be "disabled" was contradicted by his ability to achieve academic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases