1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 699 N.W.2d
  5. 699 N.W.2d 758 (2005)
 

IN RE WREN

No. A04-207.

699 N.W.2d 758 (2005)

In the Matter of the Kenneth WREN Residential Relocation Claim. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, a public body corporate and politic under Minnesota law, Appellant, v. Kenneth Wren, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 28, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Thomson, Robert J.V. Vose, Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Jon W. Morphew, Schnitker & Associates, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent Kenneth Wren.

David Allan Davenport, Winthorp & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis MN, for Intervener Lyndale Gateway LLC.

Susan L. Naughton, League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Curiae League of Minnesota Cities.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) appeals from an administrative order directing it to pay relocation benefits to respondent Kenneth Wren pursuant to the Minnesota Uniform Relocation Act (MURA), Minn.Stat. §§ 117.50-117.56 (2002). The HRA contends that it should not be liable to pay the benefits because it contracted with a private developer to negotiate with Wren for the purchase of his home...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases