POTENTE v. COUNTY OF HUDSON


874 A.2d 580 (2005)

378 N.J. Super. 40

Joseph POTENTE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COUNTY OF HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant, and Carmen Messano, as Prosecutor of Hudson County and Robert B. Martin, as Chief of Investigations of the Hudson County Prosecutor's Office, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 3, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donato J. Battista, Hudson County Counsel, for appellant (Michael L. Dermody, First Assistant County Counsel, on the brief).

Cohen, Leder, Montalbano & Grossman, Kenilworth, for respondent (Brian E. Curtis, on the brief).

Before Judges A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, CUFF and WEISSBARD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by:

A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, P.J.A.D.

One of the issues presented in this appeal is whether a successful claimant is entitled to prejudgment interest, as authorized by Rule 4:42-11(b), in an action pursuant to the Law Against Discrimination (LAD)1 against a public entity employer. We hold that such claimant is entitled to prejudgment interest.

I

Plaintiff Joseph Potente...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases