NARDELLO v. TOWNSHIP OF VOORHEES


873 A.2d 577 (2005)

377 N.J. Super. 428

Jeffrey NARDELLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF VOORHEES, Keith Hummel, Louis Bordi, John Prettyman, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 4, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford L. Van Syoc, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant (Van Syoc Chartered, attorneys; Mr. Van Syoc and James E. Burden, on the brief).

Patricia A. Smith, Voorhees, argued the cause for respondent (Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, attorneys; Ms. Smith and Edward T. Groh, on the brief).

Before Judges BRAITHWAITE, LISA and WINKELSTEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

WINKELSTEIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Jeffrey Nardello, appeals from the Law Division's summary judgment dismissing his complaint under New Jersey's Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8. We reverse.1

Plaintiff was employed as a police officer by the Voorhees Township Police Department from September 1980 until September 2002. Defendant Keith Hummel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases