REYNOLDS v. HARTFORD FIN. SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Nos. 03-35695, 04-35279.

426 F.3d 1020 (2005)

Jason Ray REYNOLDS; Matthew Rausch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.; Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. Ajene Edo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Geico Casualty Company, Defendant, and Geico General Insurance Company; Geico Indemnity Company; Government Employees Insurance Company, Subsidiaries of Geico corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 3, 2005.

Amended October 24, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve D. Larson and Scott A. Shorr, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter PC, Portland, OR, for Appellants Edo, Rausch, and Reynolds.

Robert D. Allen and Meloney Cargil Perry, Baker & McKenzie, Dallas, Texas; Christopher Van Gundy, Baker & McKenzie, San Francisco, CA; Thomas Gordon, Gordon & Polscer, LLC, Portland, OR, for Appellees GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, and Government Employees Insurance Company.

Lisa E. Lear, Douglas G. Houser, Loren D. Podwill, and Andrew Grade, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Portland, OR, for Appellees Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

William E. Kovacic, General Counsel, John F. Daly, Deputy General Counsel for Litigation, and Lawrence DeMille Wagman, on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission as Amicus Curiae in support of Appellants Edo, Rausch, and Reynolds.

Gilbert T. Schwartz and Heidi S. Wicker, Schwartz & Ballen LLP, on behalf of The American Insurance Association, The Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, The National Association of Professional Insurance Agents, and The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, as Amicus Curiae in support of Appellees, Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., and Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

Before REINHARDT, BERZON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.


REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), insurance companies are required to send adverse action notices to consumers whenever they increase the rates for insurance on the basis of information contained in consumer credit reports. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681a(k)(1)(B)(i), 1681m(a).1 The principal question before us is straightforward: Does FCRA's adverse action notice requirement apply to the rate first charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases