1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 429 F.3d
  5. 429 F.3d 1011 (2005)
 

U.S. v. CAMPA

Nos. 01-17176, 03-11087.

429 F.3d 1011 (2005)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben CAMPA, a.k.a. John Doe 3, a.k.a. Vicky, a.k.a. Camilo, a.k.a. Oscar, Rene Gonzalez, a.k.a. Iselin, a.k.a. Castor, Gerardo Hernandez, a.k.a. Giro, a.k.a. Manuel Viramontez, a.k.a. John Doe 1, a.k.a. Manuel Viramontes, Luis Medina, a.k.a. Oso, a.k.a. Johnny, a.k.a. Allan, a.k.a. John Doe 2, Antonio Guerrero, a.k.a. Rolando Gonzalez-Diaz, a.k.a. Lorient, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo Hernandez, a.k.a. Giro, a.k.a. Manuel Viramontez, a.k.a. John Doe 1, a.k.a. Manuel Viramontes, Luis Medina, a.k.a. Oso, a.k.a. Johnny, a.k.a. Allan, a.k.a. John Doe 2, Rene Gonzalez, a.k.a. Iselin, a.k.a. Castor, Antonio Guerrero, a.k.a. Rolando Gonzalez-Diaz, a.k.a. Lorient, Ruben Campa, a.k.a. John Doe 3, a.k.a. Vicky, a.k.a. Camilo, a.k.a. Oscar, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

October 31, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joaquin Mendez, Jr. (Fed. Pub. Def.), Joaquin Mendez, P.A., Philip Robert Howowitz (Court-Appointed), Law Office of Philip R. Horowitz, Paul A. McKenna (Court-Appointed), McKenna & Obront, William M. Norris (Court-Appointed), William M. Norris, P.A., Kathleen M. Williams (Fed. Pub. Def.), Jack R. Blumenfeld (Court-Appointed), Richard C. Klugh, Jr. (Fed. Pub. Def.), Miami, FL, Leonard I. Weinglas, New York City, for Appellants.

Anne R. Schultz, David Marc Buckner, Caroline Heck Miller, U.S. Atty., Miami, FL, for U.S.

Erik Luna, University of Utah College of Law, Salt Lake City, UT, for Amicus Curiae Sociedad Cubana de Ciencias Penales.

Carl Peter Erlinder, William Mitchell College of Law, St. Paul, MN, for Amicus Curiae Nat. Lawyers Guild.

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases