SPYROPOULOS v. HIRSH


17 A.D.3d 125 (2005)

792 N.Y.S.2d 447

PETER SPYROPOULOS, Appellant, v. WILLIE HAIM HIRSH, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 5, 2005.


Defendant should not be prejudiced by his prior attorney's default, which was inadvertent, unintentional and an isolated incident devoid of any pattern of dilatory behavior (CPLR 2005; Latha Rest. Corp. v Tower Ins. Co., 285 A.D.2d 437 [2001]).

The advertisement contract between METROPAGES, INC. and the restaurant was accepted and signed by plaintiff himself, whereby he agreed that "(a) The advertiser and/or agency is authorized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases