Defendant-Appellant D. Mark Pentrack appeals the sentence imposed for his role in an internet fraud scam. He argues (1) the district court improperly enhanced his sentence by relying on an Idaho consent judgment against him, which was not "specific" within the meaning of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, § 2B1.1(b)(7)(C) (Nov.2003); and (2) his sentence was imposed in violation of
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
U.S. v. PENTRACK
428 F.3d 986 (2005)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D. Mark PENTRACK, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 9, 2005.
November 9, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Paul M. Warner, United States Attorney, Elizabethanne C. Stevens, Assistant United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Before McCONNELL, HOLLOWAY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.