1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 413 F.3d
  5. 413 F.3d 999 (2005)
 

PAULSEN v. DANIELS

Nos. 03-35337, 03-35360, 03-35356, 03-35355, 03-35354, 03-35352, 03-35351, 03-35350, 03-35349, 03-35347, 03-35346, 03-35344, 03-35343, 03-35341, 03-35340, 03-35339.

413 F.3d 999 (2005)

Clarence I. PAULSEN, III, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden, of FCI Sheridan, Respondent-Appellant. Jeffrey D. Pullins, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Dennis W. Bohner, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Randolph Brown, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Jeremy E. James, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Karlos Lamar Grier, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correction Institution, Sheridan, OR, Respondent-Appellant. Shawn Robert Lee, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert Hood, Respondent-Appellant. Adrian L. Johnson, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Sabil M. Mujahid, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Jacob Jones, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Vincente Subia, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Jason Robert Tuite, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Robert A. Hood, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Sean Moore, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Earl Leonard, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Charles R. Norgaard, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniels, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. Robert Allen Furnas, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Charles A. Daniel, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. Gannon, Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondents-appellants.

Stephen R. Sady, Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender, Portland, OR, for the petitioners-appellees.

Before BEEZER, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

We consider in this appeal whether the Bureau of Prisons ("Bureau") violated the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") in adopting an interim regulation pertaining to an early release incentive program for federal prisoners who had successfully completed a substance abuse program. We conclude that the district court correctly held that the Bureau violated the APA, and that the petitioners were entitled to relief.

I

This appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases