1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 385 F.Supp.2d
  5. 385 F.Supp.2d 1026 (2005)
 

IMAX CORP. v. IN-THREE, INC.

No. CV 05-1795 FMC (MCX).

385 F.Supp.2d 1026 (2005)

IMAX CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. IN-THREE, INC. Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

July 21, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Stephens Clay, Geoffrey K. Gavin, Mitchell G. Stockwell, R. Charles Henn, Jr., Susan A. Cahoon, Kilpatrick Stockton, Atlanta, GA, Chad S. Hummel, Manatt Phelps & Phillips, Los Angeles, CA, James J. Hefferan, Jr., Tonya Deem, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, Noel Scott Cohen, Manatt Phelps & Phillips, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Heidi L. Keefe, Mark R. Weinstein, Samuel C. O'Rourke, William Sloan Coats, White and Case, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants.

Craig W. Clark, White and Case, Palo Alto, CA, for Claimant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

COOPER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (docket no. 45), filed June 7, 2005. The Court, having read and considered the moving, opposition and reply documents submitted in connection with this motion, hereby DENIES the motion for the reasons and in the manner set forth below. The Court deems...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases