NOLAN v. CITY OF MILFORD

No. 26364.

886 A.2d 493 (2005)

92 Conn.App. 607

John P. NOLAN et al. v. CITY OF MILFORD.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 13, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Bonsangue, with whom, on the brief, was Max Stuart Case, Milford, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Matthew B. Woods, Norwalk, with whom, on the brief, was Cynthia C. Anger, assistant city attorney, for the appellee (defendant).

FLYNN, McLACHLAN and DUPONT, Js.


FLYNN, J.

The plaintiffs, John P. Nolan and Laurel Dixon-Nolan, appeal from the judgment of the trial court determining that the defendant, the city of Milford (city) overvalued their improved residence and land on Point Lookout and reducing their assessment from $2,546,700 to $2,066,880. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim: (1) the court improperly considered the city assessor's testimony, which was biased; (2) the defendant's appraisal report should not have been considered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases