1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 106 Ohio
  5. 106 Ohio St.3d 30 (2005)
 

BRICKMAN & SONS v. NAT. CITY BANK

No. 2004-0819.

106 Ohio St.3d 30 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3559

BRICKMAN & SONS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Corrado, for appellees.

Tucker Ellis & West, L.L.P., Irene C. Keyse-Walker, and Frank R. Osborne, for appellant.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court must decide whether a transfer is proper when an administrative judge's entry of reassignment under authority of the Rules of Superintendence does not state the reason for the transfer, but the reason is clear from the record. For the reasons that follow, we answer in the affirmative and, therefore, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases