1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 115 P.3d
  5. 115 P.3d 1244 (2005)
 

PAIGE v. STATE

Nos. A-8663, A-8664.

115 P.3d 1244 (2005)

Adrian PAIGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

June 17, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brant McGee, Assistant Public Defender, and Barbara K. Brink, Public Defender, Anchorage, for Appellant.

Kenneth M. Rosenstein, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Special Prosecutions and Appeals, Anchorage, and Gregg D. Renkes, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellee.

Before: COATS, Chief Judge, and MANNHEIMER and STEWART, Judges.

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

In this case, the sentencing judge did not specify during his remarks at sentencing whether the defendant's sentences were concurrent or consecutive. We hold that, under former AS 12.55.025(e), when a sentencing judge does not specify whether a defendant's sentences are concurrent or consecutive, the sentences must be deemed concurrent.

Factual background

Adrian Paige was convicted of multiple offenses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases