Plaintiff is a construction company that built a restaurant for the defaulting defendants (collectively Westbury); appellant (Café Concepts) is a corporation that acts as managing agent for Westbury's various restaurants. Plaintiff claims that Café Concepts guaranteed the $300,000 remaining unpaid on plaintiff's contract with Westbury; Café Concepts claims that the writing on which plaintiff relies to prove the alleged guarantee is not sufficient to satisfy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.