In a separate order, same court and Justice, entered June 30, 2004, plaintiffs' motion for further disclosure and for leave to amend the complaint was denied. The July 1 order relies on the June 30 order in dismissing the complaint as against respondent. With respect to plaintiffs' request for further disclosure, the motion court properly rejected their "vague arguments" that further disclosure might uncover evidence raising an issue
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FERNANDEZ v. HICO CORPORATION
24 A.D.3d 110 (2005)
804 N.Y.S.2d 246
HECTOR FERNANDEZ et al., Appellants, v. HICO CORPORATION, Defendant, and REFUSE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 1, 2005.
December 1, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
