1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 108 P.3d
  5. 108 P.3d 1230 (2005)
 

STEPHENS v. GILLISPIE

No. 22388-4-III.

108 P.3d 1230 (2005)

Karen STEPHENS, individually and as the parent and guardian of S.S. and L.S., minors, Appellant, v. Mina GILLISPIE and Bobbi Gillispie, husband and wife, Defendants, Jeremy Gillispie, a single person, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.

March 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Thompson, Attorney at Law, Yakima, WA, for Appellant.

David L. Petersen, Roach & Petersen LLP, Pasco, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

¶ 1 This is a dispute over the meaning of a standard stipulation and order of dismissal, and specifically whether it was intended to include respondent, Jeremy Gillespie.1 The claims against him had been reduced to judgment. We conclude that the appellant2 has made a sufficient showing to invoke the context rule articulated in Berg v. Hudesman3 and remand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases