BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Petitioner,
City of Tacoma; Port of Seattle; Coral Power, L.L.C.; Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc., Intervenors,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
PacifiCorp, Respondent-Intervenor.
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.; Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc.; Duke Energy North America, LLC, Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC, (Collectively, "Duke Energy"); El Paso Merchant Energy L.P.; Metropolitan Water District of Southern California; Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Company; Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc., Petitioners,
Coral Power, L.L.C., Intervenor,
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.
Southern California Edison Company; City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Petitioners,
Port of Seattle; City of Tacoma; People of the State of California; City of Pasadena; City of San Diego; CA State Assembly, Petitioners-Intervenors,
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Petitioner,
Port of Seattle; City of Tacoma; People of the State of California; City of Pasadena; City of San Diego; CA State Assembly, Petitioners-Intervenors,
City of Pasadena, California, Intervenor,
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.
Azusa, Banning, Colton, and Riverside, California, Petitioner,
Coral Power, L.L.C.; Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc., Intervenors,
v.
Federal Energy Regulatory commission, Respondent,
PacifiCorp, Respondent-Intervenor.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted April 12, 2005.
Filed September 6, 2005.