1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 400 F.3d
  5. 400 F.3d 910 (2005)
 

SENTRY PROTECTION PRODUCTS, INC. v. EAGLE MFG. CO.

No. 04-1392.

400 F.3d 910 (2005)

SENTRY PROTECTION PRODUCTS, INC. and HERO PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EAGLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 11, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lesley A. Weigand, Wegman, Hessler & Vanderburg, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the brief were Bruce E. Peacock and Karl R. Wetzel.

R. Eric Gaum, Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, of Akron, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel was Edward F. Welsh, Armstrong, Kratz, Quintos, Hanson & Brooks, LLP, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PROST, Circuit Judge.

Sentry Protection Products, Inc. and Hero Products, Inc. (collectively, "Sentry") appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Case No. 1:01-CV-2240 (Apr. 1, 2004), granting summary judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,244,781 (" '781 patent") to defendant Eagle Manufacturing Co. ("Eagle") and granting summary judgment to Eagle on infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,102...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases