1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 117 P.3d
  5. 117 P.3d 1189 (2005)
 

TINGEY v. HAISCH

No. 23289-1-III.

117 P.3d 1189 (2005)

David L. TINGEY, Respondent, v. Lloyd HAISCH and Lucy Haisch, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three, Panel Nine.

August 18, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. Moberg, Attorney at Law Moses Lake, WA, for Appellants.

David L. Tingey, Law Office of David L. Tingey, Renton, WA, for Respondent.

KURTZ, J.

¶ 1 Lloyd Haisch entered into an oral agreement for legal services with attorney David Tingey. After more than three years had elapsed, Mr. Tingey brought an action for recovery of his attorney fees. At summary judgment, the trial court held that Mr. Tingey's claim for attorney fees was subject to a six-year statute of limitations as an account receivable under RCW 4.16.040(2),1 not a three-year statute of limitations as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases