1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 124 P.3d
  5. 124 P.3d 1161 (2005)
 

KING v. CARTLIDGE

No. 43278.

124 P.3d 1161 (2005)

Carter R. KING, Esq., Appellant, v. Blaine E. CARTLIDGE, Esq., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

December 29, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas L. Qualls, Reno, for Appellant.

Blaine E. Cartlidge Esq., Reno; Lemons Grundy & Eisenberg and Tiffinay Barker Pagni, Reno, for Respondent.

Before DOUGLAS, ROSE and PARRAGUIRRE, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, we consider whether the district court abused its discretion in granting respondent's motion for summary judgment because appellant failed to file an opposition within the deadline set by Rule 13(3) of the District Court Rules (DCR) and did not set forth any evidence showing a genuine issue for trial. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and thus affirm.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases