1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 5 N.Y.3d
  5. 5 N.Y.3d 122 (2005)
 

PEOPLE v. PAULMAN

5 N.Y.3d 122 (2005)

833 N.E.2d 239

800 N.Y.S.2d 96

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH J. PAULMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 29, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Tyo, Shortsville, for appellant.

R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney, Canandaigua (James B. Ritts of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAFFEO, J.

During a child sexual abuse investigation, defendant made four incriminating statements to the police in successive interrogations spanning a period of several hours. The Appellate Division ruled that one of the statements was inadmissible because it had not been preceded by Miranda warnings. The primary issue presented in this case is whether two statements defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases