1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 111 P.3d
  5. 111 P.3d 1162 (2005)
 

STATE v. PULFREY

No. 75301-6.

111 P.3d 1162 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Van R. PULFREY, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided May 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maureen Marie Cyr, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Andrea Ruth Vitalich, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, for Respondent.

SANDERS, J.

¶ 1 We review a partially published Court of Appeals opinion affirming Van Pulfrey's conviction for possession of methamphetamine. He argues the arresting officer failed to exercise statutorily granted discretion, choosing to arrest rather than cite and release. Pulfrey claims this failure to exercise discretion violates article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. Further, Pulfrey argues under City of Redmond v. Moore

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases