The boiler defendants were properly granted summary judgment upon evidence demonstrating that they were hired to and did replace the boiler's coil, not the mixing valve that caused plaintiff's scalding injury. In the absence of a contract for routine or systematic maintenance, an independent repairer/contractor has no duty to install safety devices or to inspect or warn of any purported defects (see Rosa v Mid Hudson Clarklift,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DANIELS v. KROMO LENOX ASSOCIATES
16 A.D.3d 111 (2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 17
SEAN DANIELS, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, LINDA DANIELS, Appellant, v. KROMO LENOX ASSOCIATES et al., Defendants, and A.L. EASTMOND AND SONS, INC., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 1, 2005.
March 1, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
