1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 883 A.2d
  5. 883 A.2d 384 (2005)
 

WALLACE v. SUMMERHILL NURSING

883 A.2d 384 (2005)

380 N.J. Super. 507

Mark WALLACE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. SUMMERHILL NURSING HOME, Respondent-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 15, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Ventrice, Metuchen, argued the cause for appellant (Brause, Brause & Ventrice, attorneys; Mr. Ventrice, of counsel and on the brief).

Allan L. Lockspeiser, Perth Amboy, argued the cause for respondent (Wysoker, Glassner, Weingartner, Gonzalez & Lockspeiser, attorneys; Mr. Lockspeiser, on the brief).

Before Judges LEFELT, ALLEY and FUENTES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

This appeal is taken from an order entered by the judge of compensation enforcing a settlement agreement reached by the parties in a workers' compensation case. Petitioner's employer, respondent Summerhill Nursing Home, argues that the court committed reversible error by refusing to set aside the settlement based on a mutual mistake of fact. After reviewing the record, we agree with respondent's position...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases