WASHINGTON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASS'N v. STATE

No. 31824-5-II.

110 P.3d 1154 (2005)

WASHINGTON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION and Robert Benning, Daniel M. Hahn, Herbert T. Nelson, Tony M. Perez, Cheryl A. Walpole, as individuals and class representatives for all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. STATE of Washington, Washington Personnel Resources Board, Washington Department of Personnel, and Linda Lanham, Eugene Matt, and Leonard Nord in their official capacities, Respondents. Geneva L. Schroll, Lisa A. Vasconi, and Andrea M. Tautfest, as individuals and as class representatives for all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. District 1199 NW Hospital and Health Care Employees Union, SEIU, AFLCIO, State of Washington, Washington Personnel Resources Board and Linda Lanham, Eugene Matt, and Leonard Nord, in their official capacities, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

April 26, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Suzanne J. Shaw, Office of the Atty. Gen., Spencer Walter Daniels, Olympia, WA, Martha A. Barron, Paul Drachler, Douglas Drachler & Mckee LLP, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

Edward Earl Younglove, Olympia, WA, Martin S. Garfinkel, Schroeter Goldmark & Bender, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Washington Federation of State Employees, Olympia, WA, pro se.

Daniel M. Hahn, Olympia, WA, pro se.

Cheryl A. Walpole, Olympia, WA, pro se.

Herbert T. Nelson, Olympia, WA, pro se.

Robert Benning, Olympia, WA, pro se.

Tony M. Perez, Olympia, WA, pro se.


ARMSTRONG, J.

¶1 State employees working in general government and higher education filed statutory and equal protection claims against the State, arguing that wage disparities between employees in the two systems who perform essentially the same jobs violate the state civil service laws and the state and federal equal protection guarantees. The trial court granted summary judgment for the State. We reverse.

FACTS

¶2 This appeal arises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases