1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 111 P.3d
  5. 111 P.3d 1146 (2005)
 

STATE v. KING

PR124099; A118479.

111 P.3d 1146 (2005)

199 Or. App. 278

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Kermit KING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Rose argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Steenson, Schumann, Tewksbury & Rose, P.C.

Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SCHUMAN, Judges.

EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendant appeals after being found guilty of violating former ORS 811.123 (2001), repealed by Or Laws 2003, ch. 819, § § 19, 21, for operating a motor vehicle 52 miles per hour in a 40 mile per hour designated zone. His vehicle's speed was clocked by a photo radar device. On appeal, he makes four assignments of error. We affirm.

In April 2002, a City of Portland Police Officer was operating a photo radar device on a city...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases