1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 114 P.3d
  5. 114 P.3d 1141 (2005)
 

HUDJOHN v. S&G MACHINERY CO.

No. 01-02-40656; A121002.

114 P.3d 1141 (2005)

200 Or. App. 340

Alexander HUDJOHN, Appellant, v. S&G MACHINERY CO., an Oregon corporation, and Deere & Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 22, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dwain M. Clifford, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were James T. McDermott and Ball Janik LLP.

Bruce H. Orr, Portland, argued the cause for respondent S&G Machinery Co. With him on the briefs were James E. Bartels and Meyer & Wyse LLP.

R. Daniel Lindahl, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Deere & Company. With him on the brief were Stephen F. English, Peter J. Viteznick, and Bullivant Houser Bailey PC.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and DEITS, Judge pro tempore.

HASELTON, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants in this personal injury action, raising several assignments of error. Defendants counter with a battery of cross-assignments of error, including a contention that the trial court erred in denying defendants' motion for a directed verdict based on the legal insufficiency of plaintiff's proof of medical causation. As explained below, we agree with defendants that the trial court so erred. See Chouinard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases