STATE v. MAURSTAD

No. A04-1000.

706 N.W.2d 545 (2005)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Daniel Leslie MAURSTAD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 13, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Greg Widseth, Polk County Attorney, Scott A. Buhler, Assistant County Attorney, Crookston, MN, for respondent.

Bradford Colbert, Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by MINGE, Presiding Judge; KALITOWSKI, Judge; and SHUMAKER, Judge.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant challenges his sentence and an order denying postconviction relief from his sentence, arguing that (1) he did not waive his sentencing challenge by failing to raise it at trial; (2) his criminal history score should not have included a custody status point; and (3) he was entitled to a jury determination of his criminal history score.

FACTS

On February 6, 1996, appellant Daniel Leslie Maurstad pleaded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases