1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 118 P.3d
  5. 118 P.3d 1129 (2005)
 

ROBINSON v. HOTHAM

No. 1 CA-SA 05-0190.

118 P.3d 1129 (2005)

Akmal Jacoby ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Jeffrey A. HOTHAM, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

September 6, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Criminal Defense Associates By Angelyn Gates, Lorilee M. Gates, Woodland Hills, CA, Admitted pro hac vice.

Benedict & Martin, P.L.L.C. By John Martin and Robert S. Briney, Maricopa County Legal Defender By Richard K. Miller, Phoenix, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Andrew J. Thomas, Maricopa County Attorney By Gerald R. Grant, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, Attorneys for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Does an indigent criminal defendant possess federal and state constitutional rights to choose non-publicly funded private counsel to represent his interests in defending criminal charges? In resolving this special action brought by Akmal Jacoby Robinson we answer that question affirmatively and hold that indigent defendants have constitutional rights to make this choice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases