NUMERICK v. KRULL

Docket No. 249172.

694 N.W.2d 552 (2005)

265 Mich.App. 232

William D. NUMERICK, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Heather A. KRULL, also known as Heather A. Smith, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided February 15, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.

Released for Publication March 29, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig W. Elhart, P.C. (by Craig W. Elhart), Traverse City, for the plaintiff.

Bishop & Heintz, P.C. (by Patrick E. Heintz and Steven R. Fox), Traverse City, for the defendant.

Before: SMOLENSKI, P.J., and SAAD and BANDSTRA, JJ.


BANDSTRA, J.

In this paternity action, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. We conclude that the trial court properly determined that plaintiff's action was barred by both the language of the Paternity Act, M.C.L. § 722.711 et seq., and controlling case authority, even though the action was brought before defendant gave birth to the child that plaintiff claims to be his. We affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases