1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 868 A.2d
  5. 868 A.2d 364 (2005)
 

HUSZAR v. GREATE BAY HOTEL

868 A.2d 364 (2005)

375 N.J. Super. 463

Juliana HUSZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREATE BAY HOTEL & CASINO, INC. and Schindler Elevator Corporation, Successor in Business to Millar Elevator Service Company, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 10, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Rinaldo argued the cause for appellant (Rinaldo and Rinaldo, attorneys; Matthew T. Rinaldo, Elizabeth, on the brief).

John W. Reinman, Jersey City, argued the cause for respondent Schindler Elevator Corporation (Lamb, Kretzer, Reinman & Roselle, attorneys; Mr. Reinman, on the brief).

Dominic V. Caruso, Clifton, argued the cause for respondent Greate Bay Hotel & Casino and joins in the brief of respondent Schindler Elevator Corporation.

Before Judges PETRELLA, PARKER and YANNOTTI.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARKER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from dismissal of the complaint for her failure to conduct any meaningful discovery or obtain an expert's report within the 300-day discovery period required under R. 4:24-1(a). Plaintiff's motion to extend the discovery period was denied on the ground that she failed to show "good cause" as required by R. 4:24-1(c).

Plaintiff, an eighty-year-old woman, was visiting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases