1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 407 F.3d
  5. 407 F.3d 823 (2005)
 

VAN BUMBLE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. 04-2231.

407 F.3d 823 (2005)

Helen VAN BUMBLE and Douglas Van Bumble, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 6, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tommy L. Strunk (argued), Fishers, IN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Thomas L. Davis (argued), Locke Reynolds, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, POSNER, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Helen Van Bumble ("Helen") slipped on a hot dog and fell in the food service area of a Wal-Mart store, suffering injuries to her back and tailbone area. Helen sued Defendant-Appellee Wal-Mart for negligence, and her husband, Douglas Van Bumble ("Douglas"), sued for loss of consortium. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Helen on the negligence claim and in favor of Wal-Mart on the loss of consortium claim. Dissatisfied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases