LUNDY v. CLIBURN TRUCK LINES, INC.

No. CIV.A. 3:05CV477.

397 F.Supp.2d 823 (2005)

Fay LUNDY and Joel Lundy Plaintiffs v. CLIBURN TRUCK LINES, INC., Conoco, Inc., Individually, A/K/A Conoco Gas and Marketing, A Division of Conoco, Inc., and F/K/A Du Pont Holdings, Inc.; Concophillips Company; "John Doe" Defendants # 1-100, and "John Doe" Defendants # 101-200 Defendants

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.

October 26, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Arthur Eaves, Jr., John Arthur Eaves Law Office, Louis H. Watson, Jr., Louis H. Watson, Jr., PA, Jackson, MS, for Plaintiffs.

Kenneth W. Barton, Malissa Wilson Winfield, Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Jackson, MS, for Defendants.


SUPERSEDING OPINION AND ORDER

BARBOUR, District Judge.

THIS OPINION AND ORDER SUPERSEDES AND SUPPLANTS THE UNSIGNED AND UNDATED OPINION AND ORDER FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT IN THIS CAUSE OF ACTION ON OCTOBER 25, 2005, UNDER DOCKET ENTRY NO. 14.

This cause is before the Court on the Motion to Remand of Plaintiffs Fay Lundy and Joel Lundy (hereinafter respectively "F. Lundy" and "J. Lundy"). Having considered the Motion, Response, Rebuttal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases