On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
YOUNG, J., concurs and states as follows:
I concur in the denial because the "waiver break" in this case occurred before the issuance of People v. Ellis, 468 Mich. 25,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.