1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 876 A.2d
  5. 876 A.2d 335 (2005)
 

COOPER HOSP. v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO.

876 A.2d 335 (2005)

378 N.J. Super. 510

COOPER HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George J. Weinroth, Camden, argued the cause for appellant (Mattleman, Weinroth & Miller, attorneys; Mr. Weinroth, of counsel; John C. Miller, III, Cherry Hill and William P. Rubley, on the brief).

Daniel J. Pomeroy, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Mortenson and Pomeroy, attorneys; Mr. Pomeroy and Karen E. Heller, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, COLLESTER and PARRILLO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, J.A.D.

At issue is whether the 1998 amendment to New Jersey's deemer statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4, L. 1997, c. 436, § 1, limits an insurer's obligation to provide the full benefits mandated by New Jersey law to an out-of-state insured injured in a New Jersey auto accident, when the insurer is authorized to transact auto insurance business in this State. The motion judge ruled that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases