SCHAFFER v. CURTIS-PERRIN

No. 30452.

109 P.3d 1098 (2005)

141 Idaho 356

Paula SCHAFFER and William A. Schaffer, wife and husband, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Misty CURTIS-PERRIN and John Doe Perrin, wife and husband, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 2005 Term.

March 25, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owens, James, Vernon & Weeks, P.A., Coeur d'Alene, for appellants. Craig K. Vernon argued.

Elam & Burke, P.A., Boise, for respondents. Jeffrey A. Thomson argued.


JONES, Justice.

Paula and William Schaffer appeal the district court's Order Amending Judgment, which reduced their jury award under I.C. § 41-1840. At issue are (1) whether respondent Misty Curtis-Perrin's insurance company paid the expenses for which she sought the credit; and (2) whether the district court erred in deducting medical expenses from a general verdict where those medical expenses were sought at trial.

I.

BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases