GALLO-VASQUEZ v. U.S.

No. 03-3385.

402 F.3d 793 (2005)

Carlos GALLO-VASQUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 1, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory P. Ripple (argued), Barnes & Thornburg, South Bend, IN, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Scott Drury (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and BAUER and KANNE, Circuit Judges.


FLAUM, Chief Judge.

Carlos Gallo-Vasquez moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that his counsel at trial and on direct appeal provided him with ineffective assistance. The district court dismissed the motion without holding a hearing or requiring the government to respond. Gallo-Vasquez appeals. Because the record conclusively shows that petitioner is not entitled to relief, we affirm.

I. Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases