Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Appellant contends that he was denied his right to effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise certain issues on direct appeal which would have resulted in reversal. Specifically, appellant argues that the defense was never given an opportunity to review the various jury notes, or to have input into the trial court's response to such notes, as is required by People v O'Rama (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MARTIN
17 A.D.3d 1172 (2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 822
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEON MARTIN, III, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 29, 2005.
April 29, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
