OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The Grievance Committee served the respondent with a petition, dated January 21, 2004, containing one charge of professional misconduct. In his answer dated March 23, 2004, the respondent admitted the factual allegations but denied that he was thereby guilty of professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained the charge.
The Grievance Committee...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.