1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 902 So.2d
  5. 902 So.2d 264 (2005)
 

RAD SOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. ESSEX INS.

No. 4D04-2179.

902 So.2d 264 (2005)

RAD SOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant, v. ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Luken, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Mitchell L. Shadowitz, Boca Raton, for appellee.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

POLEN, J.

We deny appellant's motion for rehearing, but grant the parties' motions for clarification in part. Accordingly, we withdraw our opinion of March 30, 2005, and substitute the following opinion.

This appeal arises from a final order granting summary judgment to appellee, Essex Insurance Co. ("Essex"), finding that Essex has no duty to defend appellant, Rad Source Technologies ("Rad Source"), under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases