STATE v. HEINSEN

Nos. 28,820, 28,821.

121 P.3d 1040 (2005)

138 N.M. 441

2005-NMSC-035

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Danielle HEINSEN, Defendant-Respondent. State of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Rene Maese, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

September 9, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, Ann M. Harvey, Assistant Attorney General, Martha Anne Kelly, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, for Petitioners.

Eaves, Bardacke, Baugh, Kierst & Larson, P.A., Kerry C. Kiernan, Albuquerque, for Respondent Heinsen.

Mario A. Esparza Law Office, Mario A. Esparza, Las Cruces, for Respondent Maese.


OPINION

MINZNER, Justice.

{1} This consolidated appeal challenges a ruling by the Court of Appeals that the State has no right to appeal from a suppression order of a magistrate court and that the district court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear such an appeal. State v. Heinsen, 2004-NMCA-110, ¶¶ 1, 27, 136 N.M. 295, 97 P.3d 627. We granted certiorari because the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases