1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 372 F.Supp.2d
  5. 372 F.Supp.2d 786 (2005)
 

U.S. v. FELL

No. 2:01CR1201.

372 F.Supp.2d 786 (2005)

UNITED STATES of America v. Donald FELL.

United States District Court, D. Vermont.

June 9, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Darrow, Stephen D. Kelley, Asst. U.S. Attys., Burlington, VT, for Plaintiff.

Alexander Bunin, Esq., Gene Primomo, Esq., Albany, NY, Paul Volk, Esq., Burlington, VT, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, Chief Judge.

At the close of prospective juror 184's voir dire, Defendant Donald Fell challenged the juror for cause. Fell argued that juror 184 would not be able to fairly consider certain kinds of mitigating evidence and could not impartially weigh expert testimony from psychiatrists or psychologists. The Court took the challenge under advisement to review the transcript of juror 184's voir dire. This opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases