WILLIAMS v. KENNEY


877 A.2d 277 (2005)

379 N.J. Super. 118

Carol Gorga WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Linda B. KENNEY and Robert L. Tarver, Jr., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 8, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Ragsdale, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (Carchman, Sochor, Schwartz, Ragsdale & Cohen, attorneys; Mr. Ragsdale, on the brief).

Michael J. Canning, Middletown, argued the cause for respondent Linda B. Kenney (Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, attorneys; Mr. Canning, on the brief).

Bruce S. Rosen, Chatham, argued the cause for respondent Robert L. Tarver, Jr. (McCusker, Anselmi, Rosen, Carvelli & Walsh, attorneys; Mr. Rosen and Anilkumar R. Avutu, Florham Park, on the brief).

Before Judges CUFF, HOENS and KING.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

KING, P.J.A.D. (Retired and temporarily assigned on recall).

This case involves the scope of the absolute litigation privilege. We conclude that the Law Division judge's decision exceeded the scope of this absolute privilege in absolving an attorney and her client from liability to a newspaper reporter. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

I

Plaintiff is a newspaper...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases