1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 109 P.3d
  5. 109 P.3d 1042 (2005)
 

CSE v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE

No. 04CA0523.

109 P.3d 1042 (2005)

DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, David Rodgers, ADP Total Source/Auto Transport, and Royal Indemnity C/O Specialty Risk Services, Respondents.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Division II.

Certiorari Denied April 18, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Laurie A. Schoder, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner.

Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Jill M. Gallet, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, for Respondent Industrial Claim Appeals Office.

Ledbetter & Thomas, P.C., D. Dale Sadler, Denver, Colorado, for Respondent David Rodgers.

No Appearance for Respondents Royal Indemnity C/O Specialty Risk Services and ADP Total Source/Auto Transport.

ROTHENBERG, J.

In this workers' compensation proceeding, the Division of Child Support Enforcement (CSE) seeks review of the final order issued by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) concluding that a lump sum settlement awarded to David Rogers (claimant) was not subject to attachment and lien for unpaid child support under § 8-43-204(4), C.R.S.2004. We set aside the order and remand with directions.

In April 2001, claimant sustained an industrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases