1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 26 A.D.3d
  5. 26 A.D.3d 88 (2005)
 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER v. SPITZER

26 A.D.3d 88 (2005)

804 N.Y.S.2d 506

In the Matter of DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. ELIOT SPITZER, Attorney General of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 1, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Albany (Justin E. Proper of counsel), for appellants.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Jane M. Azia of counsel), for Eliot Spitzer, respondent.

Hiscock & Barclay, L.L.P., Albany (Mark W. Blanchfield of counsel), for New York State Dispute Resolution Association, respondent.

MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, ROSE and KANE, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARPINELLO, J.

The issue to be decided in this case concerns the interpretation of the more than two-decade-old statute commonly referred to as the New Car Lemon Law (see General Business Law § 198-a). Enacted in 1983 to protect purchasers of new vehicles (see L 1983, ch 444; see also Motor Veh. Mfrs. Assn. of U.S. v. State of New York, 75 N.Y...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases