1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 21 A.D.3d
  5. 21 A.D.3d 1120 (2005)
 

PEOPLE v. FORDHAM

21 A.D.3d 1120 (2005)

801 N.Y.S.2d 155

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARNOLD FORDHAM, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 26, 2005.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A trial court is not precluded from using hypothetical examples in its jury instructions to assist the jury in understanding the applicable law (see People v. Johnson, 255 A.D.2d 337 [1998]; People v. Wise, 204 A.D.2d 133, 134-135 [1994]). However, the hypotheticals must be fair and balanced, must not indicate to the jury that the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases