1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 113 P.3d
  5. 113 P.3d 1 (2005)
 

LANCASTER v. PERRY

No. 54028-9-I.

113 P.3d 1 (2005)

Troy LANCASTER, a married man, Respondent, v. Harold PERRY and Jane Doe Perry, husband and wife, and the marital community comprised thereof, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

Publication Ordered June 1, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley D. Westphal, Mark E. Mills, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Michael R. Caryl, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

COLEMAN, J.

¶ 1 Under King County Local Rule (KCLR) 26(f), witnesses not timely disclosed may not testify at trial, absent a showing of good cause. Here, the defendant failed to disclose his expert witness and did not show good cause for this failure. Moreover, the defendant did not move for a CR 35 examination of the plaintiff until after the disclosure deadlines had passed and the trial court entered an order excluding any undisclosed witnesses. Finding no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases