The ruling of the trial court, redacting any former cross-examination testimony that the defense does not wish to use, is reversed. Absent an agreement between the State and the defendant to excise particular testimony, the entire testimony of a witness, including cross-examination and redirect testimony, is admissible. Nonetheless, the trial court may redact testimony relating to the defense of insanity offered at the defendant's previous trial that is clearly irrelevant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
