FRITZ v. WRIGHT


884 A.2d 250 (2005)

Darla FRITZ and Gordon Fritz, Petitioners v. Hazel WRIGHT, Carolyn Temple, Bonnie Stuart, and Samuel Wright, Individually and Doing Business as Wright's Lane Properties, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 4, 2005.


ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned matter is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5104(b) and Article I, Section 6 of the Pennsylvania Constitution require that the same ten jurors must vote the same on each question listed on a special interrogatory verdict sheet for there to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases